A paleolithic peer review
You might think review panels have only been around for the last century or so. You would be mistaken. Archeologists recently discovered the following etched into the wall of a cave deep below the campus of Flintstone University, an R1 research institution.
Research Plan
Midday fatigue is a significant problem affecting the majority of our tribe, reducing our ability to hunt and gather effectively.
Our preliminary studies show that when goats eat the berries of plants in the genus Coffea, they become more energetic.
We hypothesize that coffee berries may be used to brew an energy drink for humans.
Our research plan will involve steeping the grinds from the coffee berry fruit or seed (or placebo) into heated water for 10 minutes. Samples will be blinded and consumed by age-matched participants. Energy levels of participants will be quantified 30 minutes later, assessed by how far each subject can run.
Unfortunately, the proposal was not discussed, delaying the discovery of coffee for many years. Here are the reviews:
Reviewer 1
- The premise is flawed as what happens in goats is not guaranteed to happen in humans.
- The PI has no experience grinding seeds.
- Water source is not specified.
Reviewer 2
- Leaves are already used to brew tea. Proposal lacks innovation.
- It is surprising that the PI did not determine whether goats are more energetic after consuming other foods.
- Only oral dosing is proposed. The PI should include alternate routes of administration.
Reviewer 3
- PI did not ensure that all participants would have equal leg lengths, complicating interpretation of the data.
- What if the alleged effects of coffee berries are not felt until 31 minutes postconsumption?
- Findings will have low impact: It is unlikely that most people would go to this sort of trouble when they could easily take a nap.
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Opinions
Opinions highlights or most popular articles
Where do we search for the fundamental stuff of life?
Recent books by Thomas Cech and Sara Imari Walker offer two perspectives on where to look for the basic properties that define living things.
Scientists around the world report millions of new discoveries every year
Science is a collaborative endeavor, and international teams have contributed to a huge rise in scientific output.
Who decides when a grad student graduates?
Ph.D. programs often don’t have a set timeline. Students continue with their research until their thesis is done, which is where variability comes into play.
Redefining ‘what’s possible’ at the annual meeting
The ASBMB Annual Meeting is “a high-impact event — a worthwhile investment for all who are dedicated to advancing the field of biochemistry and molecular biology and their careers.”
鶹ýɫƬ impressions of water as cuneiform cascade*
Inspired by "the most elegant depiction of H2O’s colligative features," Thomas Gorrell created a seven-tiered visual cascade of Sumerian characters beginning with the ancient sign for water.
Water rescues the enzyme
“Sometimes you must bend the rules to get what you want.” In the case of using water in the purification of calpain-2, it was worth the risk.