鶹ýɫƬ

Editorial

When leaders choose self-interest over science, the consequences are deadly

Benjamin Corb
June 26, 2020

The Trump administration has declared victory over the COVID-19 pandemic, choosing a political strategy of ignoring the risk to human life posed by the virus so that the president might have a better shot at re-election.  

Mask-400-267.jpg
Allie on Unsplash

This dangerous self-interest is exemplified by the  and in Vice President Mike Pence’s inexplicable op-ed in the Wall Street Journal telling Americans that “we are winning the fight against the invisible enemy.”  

, the vice president calls the White House’s “whole-of-America” approach a success and praises President Donald Trump’s leadership.  Unless the “whole-of-America” approach is to make the whole country sick, it’s hard to call what’s happening a success.

This administration has sidelined public health and disease experts, ignored the pleas of doctors and nurses, and, caught up in a conspiracy theory circulated by conservative media, even gotten a peer-reviewed grant revoked.  

The result? America was late to adopt a testing protocol that could have helped us track and slow the spread of the virus. . And, in the absence of federal leadership, state and local officials have jockeyed for scarce resources. 

. We also lead the world in unproven and dangerous medical recommendations by our political leaders.

Early on, the administration created the White House Coronavirus Task Force and put Pence in charge. Experts, including infectious disease specialist Dr. Anthony Fauci, were on the task force and briefed the American people daily. They provided valuable information about how the virus spreads and can be contained and about scientific and therapeutic findings. Fauci was the public face of the scientific community, making it easier for the public to trust and follow experts’ recommendations.

As the public need for information increased the viewership of these briefings, their focus shifted. Americans saw the death toll rising, economy failing and unemployment exploding, but Trump saw his poll numbers dropping.  to tout unsubstantiated treatments and attack those who disagreed with him. While doctors talked about the sacrifices that would need to be made to “flatten the curve,” the president offered a more positive prognosis for political purposes. 

The task force, which is slated to brief the public today for the first time in two months, is said to now meet only once or twice a week. Fauci has said he hasn’t spoken with the president in weeks. 

Meanwhile, in nearly half of the country, governors have followed Trump’s lead and enacted a reopening schedule that doesn’t conform to CDC guidelines. Unsurprisingly, there have been spikes of cases and deaths. Experts now say the rushed reopening resulted in the first wave of infection not dropping as much as it could have and, contrary to Pence’s claims, that a second wave is increasingly likely.  

Now that virus-containment efforts, which had been working, have been abandoned, our only hope is herd immunity. Achieving herd immunity would require upwards of 70% of the country to have survived the virus and developed natural immunity to it or have been vaccinated against it. While scientists are confident a vaccine will be possible, most don’t think one will be ready by the fall, as the president has suggested. 

But Trump’s political desires have proved more important than sound science in the past, and few seem willing to stand up to him. He repeatedly promoted the use of hydroxychloroquine, later found to do more harm than good, as leaders sharing the stage stayed mum. . How can we be certain Food and Drug Administration Director Stephen Hahn won’t fold under pressure when it comes to a vaccine?

And what if a vaccine is elusive? Assuming infection confers natural immunity —  — that means the administration is willing to sacrifice between 1.1 million and 2.3 million Americans (most of them black and brown) to COVID-19, based upon the current fatality rate ranging between 0.5% and 1%. 

It’s impossible to predict if the president’s strategy of ignoring the pandemic will help him win reelection. But America will lose if he continues to ignore the science.

Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?

Become a member to receive the print edition monthly and the digital edition weekly.

Learn more
Benjamin Corb

Benjamin Corb is the former director of public affairs at ASBMB.

Get the latest from ASBMB Today

Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.

Latest in Opinions

Opinions highlights or most popular articles

At a career crossroads: Exploring postdoc, faculty and industry paths
Essay

At a career crossroads: Exploring postdoc, faculty and industry paths

Sept. 19, 2024

“At the crossroads of an academic career, postdocs find ourselves grappling with a challenging decision … about defining our trajectory in academia and shaping the impact we want to have in the academic community.”

How do you help a biochemist find a career path?
Essay

How do you help a biochemist find a career path?

Sept. 18, 2024

Industry, academia and the ASBMB join forces to introduce students job options in the sciences with a panel, networking and cheese.

'Don’t be afraid to take a different path'
Profile

'Don’t be afraid to take a different path'

Sept. 11, 2024

In 2016, MOSAIC scholar Rebecca Ann Faulkner paused her career for four years to focus on her family, a decision she believes made her a more effective and empathetic scientist.

The perverse legacy of participation in human genomic research
Essay

The perverse legacy of participation in human genomic research

Sept. 7, 2024

The story of how one person became the majority source of DNA for the Human Genome Project encapsulates 20th-century researchers’ attitudes toward donor consent, the author says.

Announcing the winners of the 鶹ýɫƬ Motifs bioart competition
Contest

Announcing the winners of the 鶹ýɫƬ Motifs bioart competition

Sept. 3, 2024

The 12 winning works of art to be featured in the 2025 ASBMB calendar were selected from 37 entries received from scientists in both academia and industry at all career stages with submissions coming from as far away as Pakistan and Brazil.

The fourth third of my career: Living the dream
Essay

The fourth third of my career: Living the dream

Aug. 28, 2024

After a few decades of being a professor, Jonathan Monroe thought it would be fun to return to the life of a postdoc after retiring. Here’s how he did it.