Response to Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action
The U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Thursday on affirmative action raises significant concerns among advocates for diversity, equity and inclusion, and against discrimination, including the members of 麻豆传媒色情片 and 麻豆传媒色情片 Biology’s Maximizing Access Committee, Public Affairs Advisory Committee and Education and Professional Development Committee.
In a 6–3 decision, the that the use of race as a factor in undergraduate admissions by Harvard University and the University of North Carolina violates the Equal Protection Clause of 14th Amendment. The ruling overturns legal precedent that allowed institutions of higher education to consider race as one of the many factors in a holistic admissions process.
Affirmative action has been a vital tool used to rectify the that promotes the exclusion of U.S citizens, thereby creating the circumstances for their identification as “historically-excluded, underrepresented populations.” In other words, affirmative action was designed to include the citizenry who had been systemically excluded, thereby opening the door of opportunity so that their capabilities and excellence would be acknowledged and allowing fair competition in education and in employment.
Affirmative action is important not only for historically marginalized individuals but also for all in the educational space. — as individuals, as scientists and as a community.
This court decision is an enormous step backward, and the denial of opportunities is reminiscent of a bygone era.
Many scholars, students, and educators — especially those from marginalized backgrounds and identities — may feel that the overturning of such a long-standing policy, at a time when it remains sorely needed, means our nation and those in power no longer acknowledge their existence and experiences.
The ASBMB and others in the biochemistry and molecular biology community acknowledge systemic inequities in STEM and will continue to work toward their elimination. We strongly support our colleagues and young scholars who have thrived and contributed greatly to the scientific enterprise, despite the barriers and inequities that they have faced.
The ASBMB will continue to advocate for and fight for those whose voices are not being heard right now. Protecting and increasing diversity, equity, inclusivity, and accessibility is at the core of the society.
Finally, we reaffirm our commitment to ensure that all ASBMB events, initiatives, awards and programs will strive to enhance equity and inclusion. Despite setbacks such as this court ruling, we will not stop fighting for justice and inclusion. We echo Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s message of dissent: “(D)eeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life.”
This response was written on behalf of and in collaboration with members of the ASBMB Maximizing Access Committee, Public Affairs Advisory Committee and Education and Professional Development Committee.
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition monthly and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we鈥檒l send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Opinions
Opinions highlights or most popular articles
At a career crossroads: Exploring postdoc, faculty and industry paths
鈥淎t the crossroads of an academic career, postdocs find ourselves grappling with a challenging decision 鈥 about defining our trajectory in academia and shaping the impact we want to have in the academic community.鈥
How do you help a biochemist find a career path?
Industry, academia and the ASBMB join forces to introduce students job options in the sciences with a panel, networking and cheese.
'Don鈥檛 be afraid to take a different path'
In 2016, MOSAIC scholar Rebecca Ann Faulkner paused her career for four years to focus on her family, a decision she believes made her a more effective and empathetic scientist.
The perverse legacy of participation in human genomic research
The story of how one person became the majority source of DNA for the Human Genome Project encapsulates 20th-century researchers鈥 attitudes toward donor consent, the author says.
Announcing the winners of the 麻豆传媒色情片 Motifs bioart competition
The 12 winning works of art to be featured in the 2025 ASBMB calendar were selected from 37 entries received from scientists in both academia and industry at all career stages with submissions coming from as far away as Pakistan and Brazil.
The fourth third of my career: Living the dream
After a few decades of being a professor, Jonathan Monroe thought it would be fun to return to the life of a postdoc after retiring. Here鈥檚 how he did it.